July 11, 2006 Lafourche Parish Council Meeting
FACTS:
The July 11, 2006 Lafourche Parish Council Meeting was aired on Vision Communications, Channel 5 television.
“THANK YOU”
OPINIONS:
In my opinion, anyone who viewed the council meeting spectacle can not in good conscious vote for a tax which will continue funding this moronic plague upon the good citizens of Lafourche Parish.
1.Where was the DA, the Lafourche Parish Council’s legal adviser.
2.Where was the 5 minute time limit?
3.What planet was the Chair-person on? Where was the orderly conduct?
4.Why does Councilman Phillip Gouaux insist on advertising his lack of intelligence?
5.Why did the Council allow a special interest group to influence them into adopting an ordinance for the installation of illegal traffic devices (4-way stop signs)?
6.Why is Councilman Atzenhoffer still mumbling?
7.Why is Cullen Curole still Parish Administrator?
I will admit that I have no confidence what so ever in many of the individuals on the Lafourche Parish Council and its administration, but I never thought I would hear such a juvenile response to a legitimate question as I heard From Brent Callais. When asked by a person from the audience, why are you considering installing stop signs which will disrupt the legal flow of traffic? Mr. Callais’ response was something like, residents are backing out of their driveways onto the street, the stop signs will make it safer. Should each of us request a stop sign be placed at our driveways so we can safely back onto the street we live on? What about the people living on state highway 1 and 308, should we impede the legal flow of traffic in order to allow residence to safely back onto the highway?
There is a wise old saying, “The acorn do not fall very far from the tree”. Do you realize that the tree is running for public office on the Greater Lafourche Port Commission? Isn’t that scary? Will the moronic movement ever be stopped?
Join us again as we examine the expensive deeds of the Lafourche Parish Council.
NEWS ALERT———-NEWS ALERT————NEWS ALERT———–NEWS ALERT——–NEWS ALERT
During the Lafourche Parish Council term under the Breaux Administration, the news media (news paper and radio) criticized the majority five for attempting to maintain so-called private streets. It is reported that a judge ruled just this week that the so-called private streets are public and the Parish must maintain them. How come we are not reading about this court decision or hearing about it on the radio? Are the majority five going to receive an apology? The majority five could read the charter and interpret the charter correctly.
